In Defense of Jake Lloyd (The Phantom Menace)

Poor Jake Lloyd.

The kid who played the young Anakin Skywalker in the first of the Star Wars prequels, 1999's 'The Phantom Menace', has received been on the receiving end of so much cruel mockery in the years since that he's dropped out of acting, destroyed all mementos of his time on the film-set and by all accounts become quite an angry young man, lashing out at anyone who mentions his involvement in the film.

I really do feel for him. He was just a kid, he'd landed the biggest acting job possible for someone his age in the most anticipated movie of all time, and he had the misfortune to have a George Lucas penned-script to read from, with the man himself directing. The faults in the kid's performance can be laid squarely at the feet of George Lucas, I believe - The Secret History of Star Wars makes a compelling case that fanboy hatred of this film and of little Jake Lloyd is misdirected.

Back in the 70s and 80s, Lucas himself acknowledged that he was no good at writing, and thus his early films were far more collaborative, but after losing control of the direction of 'The Empire Strikes Back' he began to assert greater and greater control over the production of 'Return of the Jedi' and all his subsequent films, and was surrounded by sycophants and yes-men who gave him far more credit for the success of the Star Wars franchise than he was owed, leading him to make the terrible decision to write and direct the prequels himself. We all know how that turned out - they sucked, big time. And a big part of that is that the prequels didn't give us the story we'd been expecting - all the good stuff we'd been anticipating was left until the last twenty minutes of the third film, and instead we got a load of bollocks about midi-chlorians, Jango Fett and Padme's ever-changing wardrobe.

None of this is Jake Lloyd's fault. I personally think the kid did a great job under the circumstances - he was by no means the worst child actor I'd ever seen, and he was one of the few people in the prequel trilogy to really throw himself into the role. It's not his fault that he was expected to shout "Yippeee!" and say dumb things like "I'll try spinning - that's a good trick." He actually interacted a lot more believably with the digitally-added characters like Sebulba and Watto than many of the adult actors did. Nevertheless, with expectations running so high for the film, it was inevitable that people would be disappointed - nostalgia is powerful, and we all remembered 'Star Wars' as the best thing since, like, ever. The trailers for 'The Phantom Menace' certainly made it look like it would be jaw-droppingly, pants-wettingly good.

Still, I actually like 'The Phantom Menace' - arguably as much as 'Revenge of the Sith' and certainly more than 'Attack of the Clones'. It's full of fantastic costuming and beautiful scenery and absolutely brimming with clever ideas, and it starts evil Emperor Palpatine's story off well. A lot of people found the political stuff boring, but I liked it - it brought a new level of depth and nuance to the Star Wars universe. Of course there were missteps - the Yoda puppet was terrible, as were the CGI Jabba and two headed pod-race commentator. Secondary villain Darth Maul was magnificent, even if killed off prematurely. Jar-Jar Binks was painfully unfunny, and it can't be denied that both he and Watto bear unfortunate racial overtones. There was that whole midi-chlorian mess. And yes, a lot of little Anakin's dialogue was unbearably cheesy. But overall, it was a solidly entertaining film, and a far more intelligent one than the original 'Star Wars' and its second sequel, 'Jedi' ('Empire', of course, is far and away the best of the series, and tellingly, it's also the one George Lucas had the least involvement with).

I know he's never likely to see this, but if he does: Jake Lloyd, I think you did a great job, and I'm sorry it's turned out so badly for you. You don't deserve the hate.

Nerds can be so cruel.

Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure

I literally just finished watching 'Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure' and had to Google "Ewoks Caravan Terrible", and I'm reassured that that's pretty much the consensus of most critics and viewers. I don't know what I ever saw in this film - I remembered it from my childhood as pretty enjoyable. Maybe I wasn't as fussy back then, maybe all the other films of the era were just as bad (but that can't be right - ET, The Dark Crystal, Labyrinth and Willow were all awesome, weren't they? I guess I'll get to them in time) ;)

First, the good. There are some gorgeous matte paintings throughout the film, expanding the scale of the story significantly. Without them, the cheapness of the effects work and costumes would defy any attempt to suspend one's disbelief. And I always find it refreshing when a film focuses on a goal other than lurve - somehow that dullest of narratives manages to intrude into virtually every movie ever made - even kid's films. But in the 80s at least, there were some decent kids films that revolved around reuniting families instead, and this is one of those. I liked the fact that the film made explicit the parallels between the separation of the human and Ewok families - it was even possible to feel sympathy for Mommy Ewok as she cried the night before her husband and children went off on their big adventure.

And the narration was fairly decent - it was necessary, for a start, given that otherwise the culture, motives, reactions and dialogue of the Ewoks would be a complete mystery. It gave the film a strange anthropology-documentary feel, rather than the fairy-tale feel I think they were going for, but that's not entirely out of place, given that this story is set in a science fiction universe (although mysticism and magic are clearly a part of the Star Wars universe).

I actually thought the girl playing little Sindel Towani was pretty decent for someone so young, although the bit with the pond was ridiculous - they didn't even show her actually noticing her brother was trapped in the pond - one minute she's not looking at him, the next she's declaring he's in the pond needing help even though from where she's standing she couldn't possibly see him (and boy, was he under there a long time - I wonder how many takes they did? Not enough, obviously, as he was still alive to keep filming this garbage). But that's the bad directing, not the little girl's fault.

I like the Gorax, the film's antagonist, for a man in a suit it was pretty well done. But the spiders in the caves were appallingly bad - the strings on the puppet were obvious in every frame. And the boar/wolf thing earlier in the film was decent in the dark and when it was just a giant paw ripping at the tree trunk in which the kids were hiding... but why on earth they thought it was a good idea to do the daytime bit showing more of it in all its stop-motion-y tackiness is beyond me.

The most exciting bit of the whole thing was the runaway horse. It was the only point in the movie that the fact of the Ewoks just being people inn suits didn't intrude to ruin my suspension of disbelief. The Ewoks themselves were mostly tolerable, Wicket being the only one that didn't creep me out - there's something about the dead, glassy eyes of the others that's just terrifying. As for Mace... what a whiny little bastard. Did he really have to repeat every line of dialogue twice? Even if it was scripted that way, it was atrociously acted. I spent the whole movie just wanting to punch him in the face.

And perhaps the worst part of all - it's all for nothing, because (SPOILERS!!) even though the kids rescue their parents, the parents both die at the beginning of the sequel. Thankfully, so does Mace ;)

*

*Side Note: Wicket is played by the wonderful Warwick Davies, who was the star of one of my favourite films, Willow, which I mean to cover at some point.